Representation, Transformation and Discussion of the Collectivist Identity of Young Chinese Employees in Foreign-Invested Enterprises
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For a long time, Chinese employees were well recognized as generations with collective and cooperative spirits; nevertheless the once bloomed reputation has gradually disappeared among the majority of young Chinese employees today, who have presented increasing variations compared with the elder employees on the comprehension and demonstration of collectivism. The gap becomes typical phenomenon when these young Chinese employees conduct business with counterparts sharing similar cultural background from Japan, Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan regions. By conducting a thorough one-to-one interview with China’s young employees working in the transnational enterprises in China, we have found that though they have new understandings on the conception of collectivism compared with their parents, instead of completely abdicating the core philosophy of teamwork spirit in collectivism, they are just attenuating newly-bred spirits of individualism and free development. These changes root from both inner and outer levels. The one-child policy, the intense social competition along with the development of china’s economy and the household registration reform constitutes the inner reasons. In terms of the outer level, the development of new technologies in the context of globalization and modernity, as well as easier access to Euro-American cultural productions strongly influences China’s young generations’ collectivist thoughts and behaviors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".