MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2489690629 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316152652.009

Parent and Others <i>v</i>. Singapore Airlines Limited and the Civil Aeronautics Administration

2008· article· en· W2489690629 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Law Reports · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState immunityEntitlement (fair division)LawState (computer science)Political scienceGovernment (linguistics)Sovereign immunityInternational lawSupreme courtEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

264 State immunity — States — Entitlement to claim State immunity — Whether recognition by the government of the forum State a prerequisite to entitlement to State immunity — Taiwan — Canada State Immunity Act — Section 14 — Certificate by Ministry of Foreign Affairs conclusive evidence of whether or not defendant a State — Ministry declining to issue certificate in respect of department of the Government of Taiwan — Whether conclusive evidence that Taiwan not a State for purposes of State immunity — Whether Court entitled to enter into own examination of the question of statehood States — Recognition — Criteria of statehood — Declaratory and constitutive theories of recognition — Implied recognition Relationship of international law and municipal law — Statehood — Whether foreign entity a State under international law — Whether question within the exclusive preserve of the executive — The law of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1220.060

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Law ReportsSame topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207