MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2489794379 · doi:10.1057/9781137449641_6

Un)Doing Injustices

2014· article· en· W2489794379 on OpenAlexaff
Marcel Jesenský

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolish Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlovakGermanPolitical scienceDiplomacyEconomic historyNeutralityState (computer science)Government (linguistics)German governmentHistoryLawPoliticsArchaeologyCzech

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The eventful year of 1938 culminated for Czecho-Slovakia1 with the Munich conference of Great Britain, France, Italy, and Germany at the end of September 1938. The Munich conference shook the Czecho-Slovak state to its foundations and affected its relations with Poland. After the Anschluss of Austria in March of 1938 by Germany, Polish diplomacy sought to link the question of the Polish minority in Czecho-Slovakia to the question of the German minority. Warsaw demanded that Czecho-Slovakia accord the same rights to the Polish minority as to any minority in the state. During critical moments in the fall of 1938, Poland benefited from mounting pressure from Germany and the Franco-British coupling on the Czecho-Slovak government. Czecho-Slovakia sought Polish neutrality, but Warsaw took advantage of Prague’s difficulties to renew old territorial demands. Prague had to give in to Polish demands in October and November of 1938, but the outbreak of the German-Polish war in September 1939 prevented longer-lasting effects of these border rectifications.2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0920.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPolish Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207