MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2489818519 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511675805.004

Hape <i>v</i>. Her Majesty the Queen (Attorney-General of Ontario intervening)

2011· article· en· W2489818519 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Law Reports · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicConflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawJurisdictionSovereigntySubject-matter jurisdictionInternational lawPolitical scienceComityCharterOriginal jurisdictionPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

140 Relationship of international law and municipal law — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Interpretation and application — Interpretation of Section 32(1) of Charter — Jurisdictional scope — Extraterritorial application — Canada’s obligations under international law — Domestic reception of international law — Doctrine of adoption — Prohibitive rules of customary international law as interpretative aid — Principle of respect for sovereignty of foreign States — Principle of non-intervention — Principle of respect for territorial sovereignty of foreign States — Comity as interpretative principle — Presumption of conformity of Canadian legislation to international law — Investigatory actions by Canadian law enforcement officials in Turks and Caicos Islands — Whether Section 8 of Charter applying to searches and seizures by Canadian police outside Canada Territory — Territorial sovereignty — Customary international law — Principle of respect for sovereignty of foreign State — Principle of sovereign equality — Article 2(1) of United Nations Charter — 1970 UN General Assembly Declaration applying principle to non-UN Member States — Principle of non-intervention — Principle of respect for territorial sovereignty of foreign States — Whether extraterritorial application of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms interfering with sovereign authority of foreign State Jurisdiction — Principles of jurisdiction — Principles arising from sovereign equality and duty of non-intervention — Bases of jurisdiction — Interplay between various forms and bases of jurisdiction — Whether extraterritorial exercise of jurisdiction permissible — Enforcement jurisdiction — Limits on extraterritorial jurisdiction based on sovereign equality, non-intervention and territoriality principle — Principle of consent — Whether Canada permitted to exercise enforcement jurisdiction over matter outside Canadian territory without consent of other State — Whether Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms having extraterritorial application — Whether Section 32 of Charter having territorial limitations Human rights — Protection of fundamental human rights when Canadian officers investigating abroad — Effective participation in fight against transnational crime — Requirement that Canadian 141 officials follow foreign laws and procedures — Comity — Whether foreign procedures violating fundamental human rights — Balance — Whether international law or Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms appropriate vehicle to achieve balance — Whether Charter applying extraterritorially Comity — Comity of nations as interpretative principle — Appropriateness of comity — Whether any clear violations of international law — The law of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Law ReportsSame topicConflict of Laws and JurisdictionFrench-language works237,207