Hape <i>v</i>. Her Majesty the Queen (Attorney-General of Ontario intervening)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
140 Relationship of international law and municipal law — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Interpretation and application — Interpretation of Section 32(1) of Charter — Jurisdictional scope — Extraterritorial application — Canada’s obligations under international law — Domestic reception of international law — Doctrine of adoption — Prohibitive rules of customary international law as interpretative aid — Principle of respect for sovereignty of foreign States — Principle of non-intervention — Principle of respect for territorial sovereignty of foreign States — Comity as interpretative principle — Presumption of conformity of Canadian legislation to international law — Investigatory actions by Canadian law enforcement officials in Turks and Caicos Islands — Whether Section 8 of Charter applying to searches and seizures by Canadian police outside Canada Territory — Territorial sovereignty — Customary international law — Principle of respect for sovereignty of foreign State — Principle of sovereign equality — Article 2(1) of United Nations Charter — 1970 UN General Assembly Declaration applying principle to non-UN Member States — Principle of non-intervention — Principle of respect for territorial sovereignty of foreign States — Whether extraterritorial application of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms interfering with sovereign authority of foreign State Jurisdiction — Principles of jurisdiction — Principles arising from sovereign equality and duty of non-intervention — Bases of jurisdiction — Interplay between various forms and bases of jurisdiction — Whether extraterritorial exercise of jurisdiction permissible — Enforcement jurisdiction — Limits on extraterritorial jurisdiction based on sovereign equality, non-intervention and territoriality principle — Principle of consent — Whether Canada permitted to exercise enforcement jurisdiction over matter outside Canadian territory without consent of other State — Whether Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms having extraterritorial application — Whether Section 32 of Charter having territorial limitations Human rights — Protection of fundamental human rights when Canadian officers investigating abroad — Effective participation in fight against transnational crime — Requirement that Canadian 141 officials follow foreign laws and procedures — Comity — Whether foreign procedures violating fundamental human rights — Balance — Whether international law or Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms appropriate vehicle to achieve balance — Whether Charter applying extraterritorially Comity — Comity of nations as interpretative principle — Appropriateness of comity — Whether any clear violations of international law — The law of Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.472 | 0.177 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".