MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2489838936 · doi:10.1057/9780230114005_11

The Voluntary Sector as the Ethical Sector

2010· book-chapter· en· W2489838936 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Doug White

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFormalityQuarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceManagementEngineeringMedia studiesHistorySociologyLawEconomicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract On Saturday, November 16, 1940, Cornell University’s football team was in Hanover, New Hampshire, to play Dartmouth. Cornell was then ranked second in the nation by the Associated Press and was counting on a win that day, as well as one the following week, to earn a national college title. Cornell had won its prior 18 games. The stop at Dartmouth was a formality, really; its record to date that year was 3–4, and the team came into the game as 15 to 1 underdogs. On a messy, frozen field, in a grueling game in which Dartmouth held Cornell scoreless until the fourth quarter, Cornell finally tossed a touchdown pass in the final moments to win 7–3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0070.068
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicEthics in medical practiceFrench-language works237,207