Bibliographic record
Abstract
연구목적 : 본 연구는 정상 성인에서 성격의 일반적인 특정으로서의 감정표현불능증과 신체적 호소, 정서상태 및 어휘와의 상관관계를 알아봄으로써 감정표현불능증에 대한 이해를 넓히고자 하였다. 방법 : 신체적 질환을 가지고 있지 않은 정상 성인에서 한국판 20항목 Toronto 감정표현불능증 척도(TAS-20K), 신체적 호소, 연상한 단어의 수, 우울과 불안을 정도를 측정하여 그 결과들간의 상관관계를 알아 보았다. 총 662명을 평가한 후 체계적 표본추출 방법을 이용하여 다시 204명을 선택하였다. 결과 : 1) 감정표현불능증의 정도는 신체적 호소, 불안, 우울의 정도와 유의한 상관관계를 보였다. 2) 신체적 호소는 불안, 우울의 정도와 유의한 상관관계를 보였다. 3) 연상한 단어의 수는 나이와 부적 상관관계를 보였다. 4) 강정표현불능증의 정도는 연상한 단어의 수와 유의한 상관관계를 보이지 않았다. 결론 : 감정표현불능증의 정도가 심할수록 신체적 호소는 더 많으며 이는 불안, 우울의 정도와 연관되어 있었으나 어휘의 양과는 유의한 관계를 발견할 수 없었다. 【Objectives : This study aimed to examine a correlation between the somatic complaints, emotion, vocabulary and alexithymia as a component of personality in normal persons. Methods : 204 subjects were collected by age-based systematic sampling from the 662 persons without confirmed medical illness. We used the Korean version of 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale(TAS-20K) to measure alexithymia. The somatic complaints were checked by the list of somatic symptoms on the diagnostic criteria of somatization disorder and major depressive episode in DSM-IV. The vocabulary was evaluated by the total number of associating-words from the spontaneous association of word and the secondary association to given words. The anxiety and depression were evaluated using 5-point self-report scale. Results : 1) The degree of alexithymia was significantly correlated with the somatic complaints, anxiety, depression. 2) The somatic complaints were significantly correlated with the anxiety and depression. 3) The number of associating-words showed negative correlation with the age. 4) The degree of alexithymia was not correlated with the number of associating-words. Conclusion : The more degree of alexithymia increased, the more somatic complaints appeared. There was a significant correlation between the degree of alexithymia, anxiety and depression. But the degree of alexithymia was not correlated with the amount of vocabulary.】
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".