La política comercial de la UE y su impacto en los derechos laborales: una aproximación a los posibles efectos de la firma del TTIP y del CETA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Comision Europea ha afirmado su intencion de acelerar las negociaciones de la Asociacion Transatlantica sobre Comercio e Inversion, entre la Union Europea y los Estados Unidos de America, mas conocido como TTIP por sus siglas en ingles y de proceder a la ratificacion del Tratado entre la UE y Canada (CETA) antes del final de 2016. No obstante, a lo largo de estos ultimos meses han surgido numerosas voces criticas respecto de ambos tratados y las posibles consecuencias de estos tratados sobre la economia y en particular sobre el empleo y los derechos sociales y laborales. A efectos de aproximarnos a estas consecuencias el articulo aborda analisis en dos fases: en primer lugar se analizan las previsiones especificamente laborales que se han introducido, o se pretenden introducir en los textos, dentro del marco de la politica comercial de la UE; en segundo lugar se estudian las consecuencias de los principales instrumentos contenidos del TTIP y del CETA, sobre los derechos de las y los trabajadores. Finalmente se pondran en relacion ambas partes del analisis a efectos de valorar el efecto del tratado sobre los derechos laborales en ambos lados del Atlantico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".