Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Insight into the society and economy of Santa Coloma de Queralt and the surrounding Baixa Segarra region, in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, comes almost exclusively from the written records produced by the town's notarial scribes, who had become organized within a notariate by the last quarter of the thirteenth century. The establishment of this Santa Coloma scribania (the business, workshop, and office of the notariate) occurred hand in hand with the development of the town as a marketplace, and it served as a necessary element in that development. The consistent process of recording transactions in the town's scribania provided the legal structures and economic memory for efficient commerce, and it combined royal, regional, and local interests in a new economic center of authority. The procedures used by the scribes of Santa Coloma generally correspond to the notarial practices of contemporary Mediterranean Europe, but in Santa Coloma the scribes developed specific practices ref lecting the needs of a rural marketplace, their regional neighbors, and their own status as a new, notarial monopoly staffed by the area's clerics.KeywordsThirteenth CenturyNotary PublicFourteenth CenturyRoyal DecreeNotarial DocumentThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it