MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2490283531 · doi:10.1002/9781119272106.ch8

Overcoming Women's Obstacles

2016· other· en· W2490283531 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Diversity and Inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernorRepresentation (politics)Government (linguistics)Personality psychologyReading (process)Vice presidentProcess (computing)PsychologyPublic relationsBusinessGender studiesPolitical scienceManagementSociologyLawSocial psychologyEngineeringComputer scienceEconomicsPersonalityPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter commences with an interview with Christiane Bergevin, Executive Vice President at Desjardins Group. In Canada there are women at the top, and their thinking process is slightly different, and it is highly complementary with men. According to her, quite often women will be more intuitive, will be very good at thinking out of the box and, very importantly, also very good at reading personalities. Women have to network a lot more and a lot earlier, act as if there were no barriers. Women each have a role to play and a large number of men are also ready to do so. In Quebec, there are more women CEOs than anywhere else in the country, because there has been a program of equal representation on boards that are owned by the Government, such as the Liquor Board. The governor of Quebec has invested in creating equal access for women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0340.010
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0030.018
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGender Diversity and Inequality→French-language works237,207→