MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2490309424 · doi:10.1057/9780230370197_7

A Changing Society (1964–79)

2012· book-chapter· en· W2490309424 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christian Potschka

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFreedmanCompetition (biology)Period (music)Public servicePolitical scienceEconomic historyMedia studiesHistorySociologyPublic administrationLawArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In terms of audience share, during the 1960s and 1970s the duopoly consolidated and the BBC and ITV each attracted about half of the audience. With Till Death Us Do Part, Steptoe and Son, Up the Junction and the War of the Roses series the BBC produced some of its most popular and sophisticated programmes (Freedman 2001: 30). Leys (2001: 110), therefore, frames the 1960s and 1970s as the heyday of public service television, and ITV was an important part of it, largely due to the companies’ regional commitments as decreed by the ITA. Since 1957, the Authority had not changed the concessions of the first four companies. In the third contract period, running from 1968 to 1974, however, Harlech Television (HTV), headquartered in Cardiff and Bristol, replaced London-based TWW as contractor for Wales and the West of England region. Furthermore, the Authority divided the Northern Region into two seven-day contracts for Yorkshire and Lancashire. According to Barrie MacDonald: ‘that was originally done to try to create some competition in the supply of programmes to the network’. 1 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0000.005
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks→Same topicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US→French-language works237,207→