MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2490517287 · doi:10.2118/2004-096

Monitoring and Predicting CO2 Flooding Using Material Balance Equation

2004· article· en· W2490517287 on OpenAlexafffund
Shue Tian, Gang Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersUniversity of Regina
KeywordsFlooding (psychology)Balance (ability)Environmental scienceComputer sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Operating a CO2 flooding scheme successfully requires the capacity to get accurate information of the reservoir dynamic performance and the fluids injected. Though some numerical simulation studies have been conducted, the complicated drive mechanisms and actual reservoir performance have not been fully understood. Thus, there is a strong industrial need to develop models from different perspectives that may be obscured by current simulators to provide valuable and complementary insights into the reservoir performance during CO2 flooding process. The objective of this study is to develop models using material balance equation (MBE) to analyze the field data before and after CO2 injection. After matching the historical field data the proposed model can be applied to evaluate, monitor and predict the overall reservoir dynamic performance during CO2 flooding process. In order to accurately account for the complex displacement process involving compositional effect and multiphase flow, the PVT properties of reservoir fluids and the four-phase fluid relative permeability relationship are integrated in the model. This study has investigated the effects of a number of factors, such as the reservoir pressure, the amount of CO2 injected, the CO2 partition ratios in reservoir fluids, the possibility of the existence of free CO2 gas cap, the proportion of reservoir fluids contacted by CO2, the starting time of CO2 flooding, the oil swelling, and the oil relative permeability improvement when mixing with CO2, etc. This study has shown that the proposed MBE model is an effective complementary tool to analyze/monitor the overall reservoir performance in tertiary CO2 recovery process. The model has been applied to analyze the Weyburn CO2 flooding project as an example. MBE analysis also indicated that:there exists a free CO2 gas cap under reservoir condition even if the reservoir pressure is larger than MMP in the Weyburn oil field,the CO2 partition ratios in oil, water and gas phases and the proportions of reservoir fluids contacted by CO2 affect largely the drive mechanism and production performance, further experimental study is recommended,a higher oil recovery can be obtained when CO2 flood is initiated at an early life time of the reservoir, andthe effect of CO2 solubility in water under actual reservoir condition cannot be neglected. The proposed new model is the first one in developing and applying MBE to evaluate the overall dynamic performance for CO2 flooding process and a valuable insight into reservoir responses during this process has been attained. Introduction CO2 flooding is considered one of the most effective tertiary recovery processes in light/medium oil reservoirs and has achieved widespread use in petroleum industry. However, the complicated displacement mechanisms involved in the CO2 injection process have not been completely understood. Monitoring the reservoir performance and obtaining the accurate information regarding the reservoir fluid and injected fluid using actual field data will help to understand the mechanisms and manage the CO2 injection project efficiently. There are two types of methods that can monitor and evaluate reservoir performance: numerical simulation and MBE. MBE is a classic reservoir engineering tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207