Adaptive channel selection and slot length configuration in cognitive radio
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper investigates the channel selection and slot time configuration in a cognitive radio network with a number of potential channels. Each channel alternates between ON state (i.e., the primary user is using the channel) and OFF state (i.e., the primary user does not use the channel), and the state evolution process is modeled as a continuous‐time Markov process. The traffic parameters (the transition rates) of the Markov process also evolve with time, modeled as a discrete‐time Markov process. A secondary user adopts a slotted structure with dynamic slot length. At each slot, the secondary user needs to determine which channel to sense and, if the channel is sensed idle, how long the slot length should be. Considering both the amount of data that the secondary user can transmit and the duration when the secondary user interferes with primary activities, a reward definition is given. Based on the reward definition, an adaptive channel selection and slot length configuration method is proposed, which includes a reward maximization procedure to maximize the achieved reward and an update procedure for the channel state belief vector and traffic parameter state belief vector. Numerical results are given to demonstrate the effectiveness and features of the proposed method. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".