Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nietzsche’s place in the canon of political thought is often contested. Although Nietzsche’s criticism of modernity is valuable when considering the competing claims between politics (the pursuit of power) and philosophy (the pursuit of wisdom), his prescriptive statements about how to overcome the malaise of modernity are at the very least resistant (some would say opposed) to articulation in wholly political terms.The critique of the modern state is a leitmotif found in Nietzsche’s early and later works which he articulates as an explicit rejection of ‘politics’ or ‘petty politics’ in favour of ‘culture’ or ‘great politics’. 1 Nonetheless most commentators accurately point to Nietzsche’s praise of the ancient Greek state that, he argues, provided the conditions necessary to breed the qualities required to create and sustain a strong and vital culture of heroic types. 2 Generally, the debate in contemporary Nietzsche studies between the ‘political’ and ‘anti-political’ readings of Nietzsche 3 continues to consider whether politics is central to Nietzsche’s thought. What is it about Nietzsche’s thought that tells us something unequivocally important about political existence? What is it that Nietzsche points to that still remains unthought in the history of political thought? And why does Nietzsche’s thought resist interpretations that are based strictly on the terms and concepts provided by the history of political thought? These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.052 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".