MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2490707251 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316152560.007

Suresh <i>v.</i> Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and Others)

2003· article· en· W2490707251 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Law Reports · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aliens — Refugees — Deportation — Association with terrorist organization — Whether constituting a danger to the security of Canada — Relationship between security of Canada and security of other States — Whether association with group engaged in terrorism in Sri Lanka sufficient to constitute danger to the security of Canada — Human rights limitations on refoulement — Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, 1951 Human rights — Freedom from torture — Due process — Prohibition on refoulement to State where individual at serious risk of torture — Whether prohibition absolute — Whether to be balanced against national security 344 considerations — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, Article 7 — United Nations Human Rights Committee General Comment No 20 — Convention against Torture, 1984, Article 3 — Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, 1951, Article 33 Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Treaty not part of Canadian law unless implemented by legislation — International law and principles as aid to construction of legislation Terrorism — Nature of terrorism — Definition — International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, 1999 — International nature of terrorism — Whether terrorist threat to one State also indirectly endangers another — The law of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1180.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Law ReportsSame topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207