MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Noise and Repeatability of Odorant Gas Sensors in an E-Nose

2011· book-chapter· en· W2490727153 on OpenAlexaff
Fengchun Tian, Simon X. Yang, Xuntao Xu, Tao Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIGI Global eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepeatabilityElectronic noseNoise (video)AcousticsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of the characteristics of the sensors used for electronic nose (e-nose) systems on the repeatability of the measurements is considered. The noise performance of the different types of sensors available for e-nose utilization is first examined. Following the theoretical background, the probability density functions and power spectra of noise from real sensors are presented. The impact of sensor imperfections including noise on repeatability forms the basis of the remainder of the chapter. The impact of the sensors themselves, the effect of data pre-processing methods, and the feature extraction algorithm on the repeatability are considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIGI Global eBooksSame topicAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207