MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Casthouse Ventilation Design for the Production of Air-Cooled Aluminium Sows

2010· article· en· W2490820986 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tom Plikas, Tony Cesta, Lowy Gunnewiek, Jean Vanasse

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Ventilation · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBauxite Residue and Utilization
Canadian institutionsAluminerie Alouette (Canada)Hatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAluminiumVentilation (architecture)Production (economics)Environmental scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Aluminerie Alouette Inc. (AAI) smelter in northern Quebec, Canada recently completed a major plant expansion that includes a new casthouse for the continuous production of low-profile, air-cooled aluminium sows. The radiation and convection heat release of 15 MW to the workplace from the aluminium metal solidification and cooling is significantly higher than that experienced in the traditional water-cooled casting process where the majority of the heat is removed by the cooling water. The design of the casthouse ventilation system presented many challenges for achieving acceptable workplace temperatures, and limiting worker exposure to heat stress and hydrogen fluoride (HF) gas for both summer and winter conditions. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modelling was used extensively to guide the design of the building ventilation system. The casthouse has been operating successfully since start-up in 2005. Field measurements verify that the CFD modelling closely predicts the workplace temperatures throughout the facility. The simple ventilation control strategy is fully automated and provides acceptable temperature levels in the casthouse. There are no periods throughout the year where it is excessively hot or cold. HF concentration levels are well below the threshold levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of VentilationSame topicBauxite Residue and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207