Community - collectivité:multiculturalisme et droits collectifs au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'A. aborde les interferences semantiques entre community/communaute et collectivite, telles qu'elles ressortent de la legislation canadienne, en tout premier lieu la Loi sur le multiculturalisme. Constatant la double dimension du pluralisme culturel au Canada, a savoir celle des peuples autochtones et celle des minorites immigrees recentes, elle cherche a mettre en evidence divers presupposes qui se rattachent a la terminologie en question. De prime abord, la notion de collectivite en tant que categorie servant les besoins de classification juridique semble moins equivoque que le concept de communaute, davantage marque par la problematique identitaire. La question fondamentale reste neanmoins de savoir si la notion de communaute possede une valeur analytique ou normative intrinseque en droit ou si, inversement, l'acception juridique etroite de la notion de collectivite peut echapper a toute instrumentalisation au nom du culturel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".