MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2490975642 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-4339

Abstract 4339: Prognostic significance of copy number alteration burden in unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancers harboring intraductal carcinoma and cribriform architecture

2016· article· en· W2490975642 on OpenAlexaff
Melvin L.K. Chua, Jure Murgić, Melania Pintilie, Emilie Lalonde, Charlotte F. Kweldam, Winnie Lo, Alejandro Berlín, Alan Dal Pra, Michèle Orain, Valérie Picard, Hélène Hovington, Alain Begeron, Yves Fradet, Bernard Têtu, Julie Livingstone, Alice Meng, Jun Yan Zhang, Gaetano Zafarana, Neil Fleshner, M. B. Fraser, Paul C. Boutros, Robert G. Bristow, Theodorus van der Kwast

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversité LavalPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstatectomyProstate cancerCohortBiochemical recurrenceOncologyInternal medicineCribriformProstateCancerHazard ratioPathologicalClinical endpointCarcinomaPathologyConfidence intervalClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim: Men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer represent a heterogeneous group of patients with varying prognoses. Intraductal carcinoma (IDC), cribriform architecture (CA), and high copy number alteration burden are novel pathological and genomic indices that predict aggressive disease and inferior clinical outcomes in patients with localised prostate cancer. We aimed to test the independent prognostic effect of these indices in a cohort of intermediate-risk prostate cancers. Experimental methods: We defined a set of clinical and genomic indices to test for their prognostic significance in a cohort of individuals with NCCN-defined intermediate-risk prostate cancer, who were treated with radical prostatectomy (RadP) or radiotherapy (RT) (N = 173, RadP; N = 358, RT). Clinical indices include primary T-category, pre-treatment PSA level, Gleason's score and pattern, and presence of IDC and/or CA. Pathological features were reviewed centrally by two expert pathologists. Copy number alteration burden was assessed in 215 tumours of the cohort using SNP array profiling (Affymetrix Oncoscan), and reported as percent genome aberration (PGA). Our primary endpoint was to test if a model incorporating IDC/CA and PGA stratifies patients with intermediate-risk disease for risk of biochemical relapse after primary treatment. Results: Biochemical relapse was associated with PGA on univariable and multivariable analysis for the sub-cohort of 215 patients (HR of High vs Low PGA defined by median = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.04-2.49, Wald's p = 0.033). Based on modelling of the clinical indices, presence of IDC/CA was associated with biochemical relapse-free rate (bRFR) on univariable and multivariable analyses (HR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.34-2.69, p = 0.00034), along with PSA level. Risk stratification considering both IDC/CA and PGA indicated an additive prognostic effect of IDC/CA to PGA for early biochemical relapse, with 18-month bRFR of 83% in High PGA, present IDC/CA vs 94% in Low PGA, absent IDC/CA subgroups (HR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.49-4.39, p = 0.00069). A comparison of risk stratification models revealed that inclusion of PGA to IDC/CA yielded the strongest model for predicting 18-month bRFR in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer following treatment (area under the curve, AUC = 0.580, 95% CI = 0.456-0.675 [T-category, PSA, and IDC/CA] vs 0.649, 95% CI = 0.476-0.776 [T-category, PSA, IDC/CA, and PGA]). Conclusions: We herein demonstrate for the first time a novel risk stratification model integrating pathological (IDC/CA) and genomic (PGA) indices to identify patients with unfavourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, who may benefit from intensification to conventional definitive treatment. Citation Format: Melvin Lee Kiang Chua, Jure Murgic, Melania Pintilie, Emilie Lalonde, Charlotte Kweldam, Winnie Lo, Alejandro Berlin, Alan Dal Pra, Michele Orain, Valerie Picard, Helene Hovington, Alain Begeron, Yves Fradet, Bernard Tetu, Julie Livingstone, Alice Meng, Jun Yan Zhang, Gaetano Zafarana, Neil Fleshner, Mike Fraser, Paul Boutros, Robert Bristow, Theodorus van der Kwast. Prognostic significance of copy number alteration burden in unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancers harboring intraductal carcinoma and cribriform architecture. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4339.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→