MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2491072171 · doi:10.1109/94.983882

Construction and operation of an ion chamber consisting of lead plates immersed in 2,2,4,4 tetramethylpentane

2002· article· en· W2491072171 on OpenAlexaff
P. Poffenberger, R. Keeler, P. Birney, S. Bishop

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonLead (geology)Ionization chamberMaterials scienceDegradation (telecommunications)SIGNAL (programming language)VoltageCosmic rayTransient (computer programming)ElectrodeOpticsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PhysicsNuclear physicsChemistryElectrical engineeringIonizationEngineeringChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A small test ion chamber has been constructed using 2,2,4,4 Tetramethylpentane as the ionizing liquid in direct contact with an array of lead plates used as the high voltage and ground planes. The transient response resulting from the passage of cosmic ray muons through the ion chamber was monitored for a period of 54 weeks to measure possible degradation of the signal due to contamination of the ionizing liquid that may have come from the lead plates. Over the first 17 weeks of the experiment, the loss of pulse height was measured to be less than 11% per year at 95 confidence. During the following 37 weeks, a more sensitive measurement was consistent with zero loss, or a limit of less than 2.9% per year at 95% confidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical InsulationSame topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207