L’émergence d’une nouvelle génération cosmopolite ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir d’une recherche qualitative faite au moyen d’entrevues auprès de 89 jeunes Québécois français, italiens et haïtiens d’une école secondaire montréalaise cosmopolite, les auteurs tentent de cerner comment se construisent socialement les perceptions et stratégies des jeunes concernant les relations interethniques dans trois espaces sociaux : la famille, le quartier et l’école. Les éléments propices à l’échange et ceux qui y font obstacle sont mis en lumière. La primauté accordée aux caractéristiques individuelles sur celles du groupe, la relativisation des cultures, la reconnaissance de la nécessité des accommodements et de la réciprocité dans l’échange favorisent le rapprochement, à l’encontre des tensions linguistiques, raciales et de valeurs. L’ensemble des jeunes arrive à une même définition des principes de base d’un fonctionnement pluraliste harmonieux en fin de secondaire, à partir de cheminements différents conditionnés par les valeurs transmises par les familles des divers groupes ethniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".