Characterization of Cyclic Nitramine Explosives in Wainwright Firing Range Soil during Pilot Scale Treatment with Fe(0) and Phytoremediation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract : A combination of sample preparation (sieving, solvent addition, lyophization, homogenization,) and analytical methods (HPLC-UV, LC-MS) were used to determine the HMX concentration in 113 soil and 73 plant samples obtained from a greenhouse pilot study examining the potential for phytoremediation and non-valent iron addition as remediative technologies specific to soil from a firing range in Wainwright Alberta All five of the plant species analyzed (Alfalfa Medicago sativa, Bush bean Phaseolus vulgaris, Canola Brassica rapa, Wheat Triticum aestivum, perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne) were observed to extract HMX in significant quantities from Wainwright soil. No significant supporting evidence from soil samples was obtained for treatments using zero valent iron, although the high degree of in-sample variability for these samples made the assessment of marginal remediation difficult.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".