MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Performance of Subcarrier PSK Systems Using PSAM Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Lognormal Turbulence Channels

2016· article· en· W2491231402 on OpenAlexaff
Changming Xu, Julian Cheng, Hongming Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubcarrierPhase-shift keyingBit error rateComputer scienceAlgorithmModulation (music)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Probability density functionPhase (matter)Communications systemLog-normal distributionElectronic engineeringStatisticsMathematicsTelecommunicationsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingChannel (broadcasting)PhysicsEngineeringDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to increase throughput and improve system performance for free space optical communications, we consider a pilot-symbol assisted modulation (PSAM) subcarrier phase shift keying (PSK) system with maximum likelihood (ML) phase estimation. Using the phase error probability density function of ML estimation phase error, we study the error rate performance of the subcarrier PSK system with carrier phase error in lognormal turbulence channels. Results reveal the differences between the imperfectly synchronized system and the perfectly synchronized system, and how the performances are influenced by the pilot symbol length. An analytical expression of asymptotic signal-to-noise ratio penalty is derived and verified with numerical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207