MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Maternal Physical Activity During Pregnancy

2016· article· en· W2491513698 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michèle Bisson, Étienne Pronovost, Odette St-Onge, Julie Robitaille, Isabelle Marc

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyObstetricsGestationBirth weightGestational ageBody mass indexWeight gainBody weightInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Maternal physical activity during pregnancy influences infant’s birth weight and body composition, but its association with bone health has been poorly evaluated. This study aims at documenting in a longitudinal study the effect of objectively measured physical activity during pregnancy on infant’s bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD). METHODS: 7-day accelerometry recordings (Actigraph GT3X+) were performed in low-risk pregnant women at 17 and 36 weeks of gestation. BMC and BMD were evaluated by DXA in mothers and infants within 2 weeks after birth. Sociodemographics, maternal lifestyle habits, pre-pregnancy physical activity, medical history and pregnancy outcomes were collected through interview and charts’ review. Mean counts per minute (CPM) and daily time spent at moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were calculated for each period from accelerometry data. The association between physical activity data and infant’s BMC and BMD was evaluated through multiple regression models, adjusting for infant sex and length, parity, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain, multivitamin use, gestational age at delivery, infant’s age at DXA, maternal BMD and pre-pregnancy physical activity. RESULTS: : For this preliminary analysis, DXA assessment and accelerometry data for at least one visit were available for 108 pregnant women (age=29.7 ± 3.7 y; pre-pregnancy BMI=23.6 ± 4.7 kg/m2; 59.3% nulliparous) and their baby (birth weight=3451 ± 424 g; gestational age=39.7 ± 1.2 weeks; 45.4% boys). Daily time spent at MVPA at 17 weeks was negatively associated with infant’s BMC and BMD (β= -0.45 g and -0.0009 g/cm3 per 10 min of MVPA, p=0.033 and 0.026), after adjustment for confounders. Similarly, mean CPM at 17 weeks was significantly associated with infant’s BMC and BMD (β= -1.92 g and -0.004 g/cm3 per 100 CPM, p=0.010 and p=0.004). Mean CPM at 36 weeks was also associated with child’s BMC (β= -0.004 g/cm3 per 100 CPM, p=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of maternal physical activity measured by accelerometry during pregnancy were associated with a decrease in infant’s BMC and BMD. The impact of maternal nutrition on this association remains to be investigated. Supported by the Fondation des Étoiles, Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→