MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2491611659

The New Philanthropy of the Edwardian Age: the Guild of Help and the Halifax Citizens’ Guild, 1905-1918

2015· article· en· W2491611659 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keith Laybourn

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuildPolitical scienceHistoryBiologyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the decade before the First World War many of the social and intellectual tensions that existed in Britain were evident in the debate within the philanthropic community about how to deal with poverty.Central to this debate was the work of the Guild of Help, an organisation which sought to offer a new more community-based solution.Yet in the end, the Guild of Help movement failed to provide an answer to poverty since its approach was chiefly designed to endorse the existing class distinctions, the moral responsibility of the middle classes to the poor and the moral discipline of the recipient, and lacked the resources to achieve its objectives.Although it became the most important agency of voluntary help to the poor in Britain, outstripping the Charity Organisation Society (COS) by 1909, it veered little from that organisation, its resources and concerns.It might have wished to work with the public bodies and the state, in a way which was anathema to the COS but its commitment was firmly tied to a society in which laissez faire and local community action predominated.In the end the wartime state intervention of 1914-1918 turned the Guild of Help into part of a mass relief agency working with other voluntary bodies, an action which ultimately led to the formation of the National Council of Social Services in 1919.Nevertheless, the New Philanthropy which the guilds encouraged, was a fascinating attempt by the middle classes to work through the local community, still the locus of power in early Edwardian Britain, to tackle poverty, to establish a partnership between philanthropy, the community and, ultimately, the state, in an attempt to ward off the rising threat of state socialism in a climate of social crisis.It was also a movement which saw the transition from charity to social work, and one in which environmental and health considerations, began to rival the moral control of working-class life.This Edwardian New Philanthropy was powerfully represented in the Halifax Citizens' Guild of Help which was organised in 1905 and publicly launched on 12 December 1905 by a groups of citizens, including the two MPs of Halifax,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207