MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2491746247 · doi:10.1002/9783527694365.ch9

Cluster Analysis of Social Networks Using R

2016· other· en· W2491746247 on OpenAlexaff
Malika Charrad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial network analysisCluster (spacecraft)InterdependenceCluster analysisData scienceProcess (computing)Social network (sociolinguistics)Focus (optics)Computer scienceNetwork analysisSociologyWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligenceSocial scienceSocial mediaEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social networks have attracted considerable interest from the social and behavioral science community in recent years. Social network analysis studies the structures of relationships linking individuals (or clusters of individuals) and interdependencies in behavior or attitudes related to configurations of social relations. Thus, it enables researchers or practitioners to see how “actors are located or ‘embedded’ in the overall network”. This chapter focuses on cluster analysis in social networks. It aims firstly to give a wide vision of the overall process of cluster analysis in social networks, then to focus on how to apply R tools to this process, which includes data pretreatment, clustering, detecting the number of clusters, and visualizing clusters (or communities).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0820.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207