MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2491773350 · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-445-2

Amino Acid Analysis

2011· book· en· W2491773350 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Michail A. Alterman, Peter Hunziker

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2011
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAristotle University of ThessalonikiUniversität RegensburgMedizinischen Hochschule HannoverAkademie Věd České RepublikyCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversità di PisaKU LeuvenUniversità degli Studi di PadovaUniversität LeipzigUniversity of QueenslandCardiff Metropolitan UniversityUniversität für Bodenkultur WienEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichMichigan State UniversityUniversity of New EnglandKeio UniversityNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyMcMaster UniversityNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and TechnologyCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationSouth Dakota State UniversityVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityCalifornia Institute of Technology
KeywordsAmino acid analysisAmino acidVariety (cybernetics)Computational biologyChemistryBiochemistryComputer scienceBiologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amino Acid Analysis (AAA) has been an integral part of analytical biochemistry for almost 60 years. AAA was originally developed by Moore and Stein and was at the very heart of their work on the mechanism of enzyme catalysis for which they were awarded a Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1972. In a relatively short time since the previous AAA book in this series has been published (10 years), the variety of AAA methods changed dramatically with more methods shifting to the use of mass spectrometry (MS) as a detection method. At the same time, a number of old techniques acquired a new make-up, like combination of AccQ-Tag with UPLC and MS, instead of HPLC and fl uorescence. Another new aspect is miniaturization. One of the chapters in this book describes an AAA in a single cell. However, the most important aspect is that AAA in this day and age should be viewed in the context of Metabolomics as a part of Systems Biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biologySame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207