MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2491788438 · doi:10.1080/07078552.2016.1174460

Canada in the posthegemonic hemisphere: evaluating the Harper government’s Americas strategy

2016· article· en· W2491788438 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Laura Macdonald

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Political Economy · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPrime ministerGovernment (linguistics)Political sciencePoliticsPower (physics)Political economyForeign policyWestern hemisphereEconomic historySociologyEconomicsLawEthnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2007, Prime Minister Stephen Harper launched the Americas Strategy, which made the Americas a priority region in Canadian foreign policy. This article reviews the implementation of the strategy, and argues that it is best explained by a combination of domestic factors (such as changes in partisan politics and dominant class interests in Canada) as well as the recent shift towards a "posthegemonic" Americas, resulting from the decline of US power in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Political EconomySame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207