MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2491788438 · doi:10.1080/07078552.2016.1174460

Canada in the posthegemonic hemisphere: evaluating the Harper government’s Americas strategy

2016· article· en· W2491788438 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Laura Macdonald

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Political Economy · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPrime ministerGovernment (linguistics)Political sciencePoliticsPower (physics)Political economyForeign policyWestern hemisphereEconomic historySociologyEconomicsLawEthnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2007, Prime Minister Stephen Harper launched the Americas Strategy, which made the Americas a priority region in Canadian foreign policy. This article reviews the implementation of the strategy, and argues that it is best explained by a combination of domestic factors (such as changes in partisan politics and dominant class interests in Canada) as well as the recent shift towards a “posthegemonic” Americas, resulting from the decline of US power in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.859

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0170.010
Scholarly communication0.0170.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Political EconomySame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207