Development of Technologies and Capabilities for Coal Energy Resources
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is the final report for the Aerojet Rocketdyne (AR) Advanced Gasification Systems Development (AGSD) project that was initiated on October 1, 2004. The project’s primary objective is to demonstrate technologies that improve the availability and efficiency of gasification-based power plants and to reduce plant capital and operational costs. The objective will be accomplished by (1) development and testing of cooled refractory liners, (2) feed system development and demonstration, (3) pilot plant definition and planning, (4) transport gasifier feed analysis, (5) coal-biomass mixture feed analysis, and (6) coal-biomass mixture pilot scale tests. Task 1, development and testing of cooled refractory liners, was conducted at CANMET Energy Technology Centre in Ottawa, Canada. The test objectives were to screen high conductivity CMC materials with alternate manufacturing methods and a variety of surface treatments for cooled metal tubes in a slagging gasifier environment. During the CMC testing, it was found that a constantly cooled CMC will survive in good conditions and that high porosity CMC resulted in high material erosion and corrosion. During cooled tube testing, it was found that hard metal spray coat and bare Haynes 188 performed the best. Task 2, feed system development and demonstration, was conducted at at the Energy and Environmental Research Center (EERC) at the University of North Dakota (UND). For tasks 2.1-2.6, the test objective was to demonstrate 400-tons/day coal feed system operation (to 1,000 psia gasifier pressures) in ultra-dense phase flow without plugging and to achieve multi-element injector flow-split non-uniformities below 2 %RSD. Testing was successfully completed with no feed system plugging of the feed system. The majority of the other Task 2 activities were associated with the Dry Solids Pump design (Task 2.8 and 2.11), development (Task 2.10), fabrication (Task 2.12), amd testing (Task 2.13-2.15). A variety of tests were performed that verified the capability of the Dry Solids Pump to consolidate various pulverized feedstocks to a state capable of sealing and sustaining downstream outlet pressures during mechanical operation of the pump as well as during periods when the pump was turned off. However, the final operating goals were not achieved. Task 3, pilot plant definition and planning, was to define requirements for an advanced commercial gasifier with a cooled liner and to establish a preferred commercial gasifier system configuration to serve as the reference point for an advanced gasifier pilot plant concept definition. A pilot plant concept was successfully defined that is scalable and traceable to the commercial gasifier configuration. The schedule and cost for design, installation, and long-duration test operation of a pilot plant were estimated at 33 months and $\$$25.6M. Taks 4, transport gasifier feed analysis, was to determine the effects of larger sized transport gasifier low rank coals within the AR dry solids pump. It was found for the two low-rank +100 mesh size transport gasifier coals that the cohesion of these larger materials was significantly less than the coals ground to minus 200 mesh. Also, the gas permeability of the MSL transport coal was found to be significantly higher than the permeability of the PRB transport coal. Task 5, coal-biomass mixture feed analysis, was to determine the effects of coal biomass blends within the AR ultra-dense phase feed system and dry solids pump, and to determine the cost of electricity increase of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) operating on coal/biomass blends with the AR dry solids pump and ultra-dense phase feed system. In summary, it was found that 75/25 wt% coal/corn stover blends produce reasonable economic results for IGCC operation with minimal dry solids pump modifications – especially if the coal is a low rank coal and the corn stover biomass is pelletized. The increase in electricity cost was found to be 1.1 cents/kWh. Task 6, coal-biomass mixture pilot scale tests, was to determine which coal/biomass blends could be tested in the current dry solids pump without major modifications. As reported in detail in the reports by Sprouse (2010) and Sprouse and Darby (2013), the coal/biomass blend having the least impact on pump configuration and operation is the 90/10 wt% Illinois #6 to corn stover ratio blend. The AGSD program was initiated on October 1, 2004. The interim final report was submitted on October 21, 2010 and covered Task 1, Task 2.1-2.9, and Task 3, performed during budget period 1. This final report covers Task 2.10-2.16, 4, 5, and 6, performed during budget period 2. The interim final report is attached as part of the appendix to this report.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".