MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2492418834 · doi:10.7195/ri14.v14i2.997

Economía Digital y su Impacto en los Medios. Presentación.

2016· article· es· W2492418834 on OpenAlexaff
José María Álvarez Monzoncillo, Guillermo de Haro Rodríguez, Javier López Villanueva

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista ICONO14 · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFinance, Taxation, and Governance
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La economía digital está impactando en todas las industrias, con especial énfasis en aquellas intensivas en información o en las que la información es el producto. Los medios de comunicación se han visto afectados por estos cambios de forma abrupta. Aspectos como el talento y el empleo, las nuevas audiencias, la adaptación al medio digital de diferentes sectores o la evolución ante los retos a los que se enfrentan son, entre otros, revisitados en este monográfico para obtener una visión de la posible evolución futura mediante un repaso de aquellos aspectos importantes del pasado.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista ICONO14Same topicFinance, Taxation, and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207