MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2492426431 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/87.s1.381

OVO-Like 1 Is a Regulator of Human Trophoblast Differentiation.

2012· article· en· W2492426431 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen J. Renaud, M. A. Karim Rumi, Michael J. Soares

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrophoblastBiologyCytotrophoblastCell biologyMatrigelProgenitor cellCellular differentiationSyncytiumStem cellCell culturePlacentaGeneticsGeneFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trophoblast cells are phenotypically diverse epithelial cells that comprise the principal structural and functional components of the placenta. All trophoblast cells differentiate from common progenitor cells. However, studying human trophoblast differentiation has been hampered by an inability to stably culture human progenitor trophoblast cells. BeWo trophoblast cells are a human choriocarcinoma cell line that exhibit the capacity to differentiate into more mature trophoblast lineages following increases in intracellular 3'-5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). Following exposure to 8-Bromo (8-Br)-cAMP, a cell permeable, non-hydrolyzable cAMP analog, BeWo cells exhibit some capacity to fuse together into a syncytium, whereas other cells aggressively invade Matrigel. Cells also exhibit endocrinological consistencies with differentiated trophoblast cells including the production of chorionic gonadotropin (CG). Therefore, cAMP-induced BeWo trophoblast cell differentiation has been used as a model to give insights into placental development in humans. We performed a microarray analysis comparing BeWo trophoblast cells cultured in the presence or absence of 8-Br-cAMP. Analysis was performed in triplicate; in total 232 genes increased >2-fold following a 24-h 8-Br-cAMP exposure, whereas 163 genes decreased >2-fold. In particular, microarray analysis revealed a dramatic induction of OVO-like 1 (OVOL1), a highly conserved zinc finger transcription factor that has been shown to play a crucial role in epithelial development and differentiation, most notably in keratinocytes. The role of this transcription factor in trophoblast development is not clear. Concomitant with induction of OVOL1 transcript expression, classical markers of trophoblast differentiation were also increased following BeWo exposure to 8-Br-cAMP, including CGA and CGB, matrix metalloproteinase 12 (MMP12), the transcription factor HOPX, and ERVFRD1 (Syncytin 2). These results were verified by qRT-PCR on independent samples. To investigate the role of OVOL1 in the regulation of 8-Br-cAMP-induced differentiation, trophoblast cells were stably transduced with lentivirus carrying PLKO.1 vectors encoding OVOL1-specific shRNAs. Control cells were infected with lentivirus carrying empty PLKO.1 vectors. Following 8-Br-cAMP exposure, OVOL1 shRNA-expressing trophoblast cells exhibited substantial knockdown of OVOL1 transcript, as well as functionally deficient responses of differentiated trophoblast cells including reduced invasion through Matrigel and impaired syncytialization. Moreover, transcript levels of CGA, CGB, MMP12, HOPX, and ERVFRD1 that were induced following 8-Br-cAMP exposure in control trophoblast cells were nullified in trophoblast cells expressing OVOL1-specific shRNA. In conclusion, OVOL1 plays a key role in 8-Br-cAMP-induced BeWo trophoblast differentiation and may be a key player in human placental development. This work was funded by NIH HD20676 (MJS). SJR is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Post-Doctoral Fellowship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207