MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2492588440 · doi:10.18192/rceh.v40i1.1606

Dos argentinas ante la Guerra Civil española. Novela transatlántica para una memoria descentrada en Mika, de Elsa Osorio

2015· article· es· W2492588440 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mariela Sánchez

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este trabajo analizo la novela Mika (2012), atendiendo en particular a la configuración del personaje de Micaela Feldman de Etchebéhère, argentina que combatió en la Guerra Civil española. El marco de ficción está dado por la convergencia entre la apelación a documentos y fuentes orales rastreables, con una apuesta por las operaciones de selección y combinación de los materiales propias de la función poética del lenguaje. El marco teórico específico aquí corresponde a los estudios de la memoria que atienden a la retroalimentación y a la fusión entre lo materialmente documentado y las vías de ficcionalización a través de conceptos como “memoria novelada” o “docuficción”. Considero especialmente el interés de Osorio por una materia histórica en principio foránea, y la elección de una impronta narrativa que abreva en géneros en apariencia reñidos con una potenciación del relato histórico. Esta memoria puede calificarse como “descentrada”, pues a pesar de que la propia Micaela Feldman de Etchebéhère ya había escrito sus memorias, se elige una escritura que desplaza el texto original respecto del núcleo dado por la autoría fija, se lo apropia y lo pone en diálogo con una nueva mirada y con diferentes mecanismos desestabilizadores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Canadiense de Estudios HispánicosSame topicComparative Literary Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207