MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transport Fuel – LNG and Methane

2014· book-chapter· en· W2492686821 on OpenAlexaff
Gouthami Senthamaraikkannan, Debanjan Chakrabarti, Vinay Prasad

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Energy · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural gasMethaneEnvironmental scienceCombustionWaste managementIgnition systemSPARK (programming language)Fuel gasEngineeringComputer scienceChemistryAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural gas can be used directly as a transportation fuel; in addition, it can be converted to other transportation fuels. Direct use as a transportation fuel requires minor modifications to the spark ignition combustion engines currently used in motor vehicles. The extent to which either of these options is utilised depends on the economics relative to other sources of energy, the availability of natural gas infrastructure and questions of sustainability and emissions. This chapter provides an overview of natural gas usage directly as a transportation fuel and prospects for its continued use in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture EnergySame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207