MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2492739052 · doi:10.1109/icc.2016.7511040

Scalable architecture and low-latency scheduling schemes for next generation photonic datacenters

2016· article· en· W2492739052 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad S. Kiaei, Hamid Mehrvar, Éric Bernier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePhotonicsScheduling (production processes)ScalabilityNetwork packetLatency (audio)Computer networkTransmission delayMaterials scienceEngineeringOptoelectronicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photonic packet switches potentially provide high switching capacity for next-generation datacenters at low cost, low power, and low footprint. In this paper, we address the scalability and packet scheduling for intra-connectivity of next generation photonic datacenters. We first propose a scalable photonic packet fabric based on a stack of small buffer-less silicon photonic switches which are timeslot synchronized by a central controller. We introduce a photonic fabric interface which offers both data path connectivity to the photonic fabric and control path connectivity to the controller. Then, we present centralized scheduling and control methods for photonic packet switching. Our scheduling methods are low complexity iterative algorithms equipped with starvation avoidance capability to meet the latency requirement for packet transmission through the photonic fabric. Simulation results indicate that our scalable scheduling schemes are capable of controlling average and maximum end-to-end packet delay for intra-connectivity in next generation datacenters which are based on buffer-less photonic switching fabrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207