MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2492864311 · doi:10.1080/03155986.2016.1197537

Analysis of uncontrollable supply effects on a co-production demand-driven wood remanufacturing mill with alternative processes

2016· article· en· W2492864311 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Rezvan Rafiei, Mustapha Nourelfath, Jonathan Gaudreault, Luis Antonio de Santa-Eulália, Mathieu Bouchard

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSustainable Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRemanufacturingPerformance indicatorProduction (economics)Time horizonProcess (computing)Quality (philosophy)PlannerProduction planningSupply and demandComputer scienceEnvironmental economicsManufacturing engineeringEngineeringBusinessEconomicsMarketingMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article applies an optimization and simulation framework to identify the impacts of uncontrollable supply in the demand-driven wood remanufacturing industry. In the remanufacturing business, providing supply of raw materials in terms of quality is an uncontrollable process, especially when combined with other industry characteristics such as divergent co-production, alternative processes, make-to-order philosophy and short order cycle times. By considering a set of key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure production plan efficiency, our framework uses a periodic re-planning strategy based on a rolling horizon. Then, the source of lumber is perturbed, leading to different supply scenarios. Simulations are conducted using a mixture experimental design approach to identify the safety threshold of supply changes in the scenarios regarding the selected KPIs. This threshold of all KPIs leads us to an overall optimum region which includes a series of desirable scenarios. The proposed framework allows planner to understand the impact of supply policies to deal with uncertainties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Simulation or modelinglow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Simulation or modelinglow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINFOR Information Systems and Operational ResearchSame topicSustainable Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207