A Comparative Study of Sino-US Festival Culture/UNE ÉTUDE COMPARATIVE SUR LA CULTURE FESTIVAL SINO-AMÉRICAINE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Festival culture is an important carrier of the emotion and spirit of nation. The study of holiday culture is an indispensable part of the study of national Since both American culture and Chinese culture have the characteristics of diversity and pluralism, comparative study of them is meaningful. This paper studies some of the major festivals in both China and the United States of America, compares the similarities and the differences in the festival practices and tries to reveal the national personality, cultural value orientation, and the national spirit of them for the purpose of better understanding and harmonious development of the two cultures. Keywords: festival culture; comparative study; Sino-US Resume: La culture festival EST un vecteur important de l'emotion et l'esprit d'une nation. L'etude de la culture de vacances est un element indispensable de l'etude d'une culture nationale. Comme la culture americaine et la culture chinoises ont toutes les deux les caracteristiques de la diversite et du pluralisme, une etude comparative d'entre eux est significative. Cet article etudie plusieurs grands festivaux en Chine et aux Etats-Unis, compare les similitudes et les differences dans les pratiques de festival et essaie de reveler la personnalite nationale, l'orientation des valeurs culturelles et l'esprit national pour une meilleure comprehension et un developpement harmonieux de ces deux cultures. Mots-cles: culture festival; etude comparative; sino-americain (ProQuest: ... denotes non-US-ASCII text omitted.) 1. INTRODUCTION Every culture is formed and developed under its own special historical and social condition. The cultural content of nation often embodies the content of common character of human being; similarly, the cultural content of time often has something of immutability in history. As an intriguing window reflecting their respective culture, festivals are precious cultural heritage of each nationality. Festival culture is an important carrier of the emotion and spirit of nation. The study of holiday culture is an indispensable part of the study of national Since both American culture and Chinese culture have the characteristics of diversity and pluralism, comparative study of them is meaningful. In history, people from different countries in the world rushed to America three times. They brought their own culture to America and later different cultural customs were mixed together. Thus the unique American culture is formed. Among the major factors that contribute to the making of American culture, ethnic diversity and religious pluralism are typical. The population of the United States includes large variety of ethnic groups coming from many races, nationalities, and religions. People refer to the United States as melting pot and the American culture a collage-like culture. The great diversity of ethnic backgrounds has produced religious pluralism. Almost all of the religions of the world are now practiced in the United States, among which Christianity is dominant. The richness of Chinese culture also finds expression in its diversity and pluralism. China is multinational country with 56 ethnic groups. All these peoples have their own legacies, but they share the same legacy as well. No matter which ethnic group was dominant, be it Hans, Mongols, or Manchus, her various peoples always could live under the same roof, worshipped the same emperor. China has 5000-year history of civilization. During each period of time, there were some cultural traditions formed and handed down to generations. China has been big country of agriculture since long time ago, and Chinese people tend to attach great importance to agriculture. Many of Chinese festivals are connected with seasons which have great influence on agriculture. The whole structure of the Chinese culture is typical of integrated pluralism. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".