MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2493026582 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139568197.006

Arar v. Syrian Arab Republic and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

2014· article· en· W2493026582 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Law Reports · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTortureLawState immunitySovereign immunityPolitical scienceHuman rightsInternational lawCustomary international lawTreatyInternational human rights lawState (computer science)Ex post facto lawCharterQualified immunityRight to propertyPublic international lawPlaintiffConstitution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

368 State immunity — Jurisdictional immunity — Canada State Immunity Act 1982 — Exceptions to immunity — No exception for acts of torture occurring outside Canada — Whether State Immunity Act thereby violating Section 7 of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Whether State Immunity Act consistent with Charter — Whether plaintiff’s action for damages resulting from alleged detention and torture barred by Section 3 of State Immunity Act 1982 — Whether defendants entitled to absolute immunity Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Canada State Immunity Act 1982 — Whether State Immunity Act complying with international law and Canada’s treaty obligations — Canada party to treaties condemning and prohibiting torture — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 — Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 — Convention against Torture, 1984 — Whether Canada’s signature of treaties requiring amendment to State Immunity Act to include exception for claims for foreign torture — Whether Parliament having sole responsibility for amendments to State Immunity Act 1982 — Whether State Immunity Act consistent with Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Human rights — Freedom from torture — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Whether Section 7 of Charter creating further exception to State immunity for acts of torture occurring outside Canada — The law of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score0.736

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Law ReportsSame topicInternational Law and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207