Arar v. Syrian Arab Republic and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
368 State immunity — Jurisdictional immunity — Canada State Immunity Act 1982 — Exceptions to immunity — No exception for acts of torture occurring outside Canada — Whether State Immunity Act thereby violating Section 7 of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Whether State Immunity Act consistent with Charter — Whether plaintiff’s action for damages resulting from alleged detention and torture barred by Section 3 of State Immunity Act 1982 — Whether defendants entitled to absolute immunity Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Canada State Immunity Act 1982 — Whether State Immunity Act complying with international law and Canada’s treaty obligations — Canada party to treaties condemning and prohibiting torture — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 — Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 — Convention against Torture, 1984 — Whether Canada’s signature of treaties requiring amendment to State Immunity Act to include exception for claims for foreign torture — Whether Parliament having sole responsibility for amendments to State Immunity Act 1982 — Whether State Immunity Act consistent with Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Human rights — Freedom from torture — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Whether Section 7 of Charter creating further exception to State immunity for acts of torture occurring outside Canada — The law of Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".