MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2493029681 · doi:10.4095/222923

New thermal evidence related to carbonate-hosted metal ores in the Northwest Territories

2006· report· en· W2493029681 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jacek Majorowicz, P K Hannigan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbonateGeologyGeochemistryArchaeologyEarth scienceGeographyMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A modern geothermal gradient map of an area in northwestern Alberta, northeastern British Columbia and southern Northwest Territories was constructed using temperature records obtained from geophysical borehole logs, all corrected for drilling disturbance. The map illustrates the thermal regime present in theMackenzie shale basin to the north of the Presqu'ile Barrier Complex, and within the Barrier itself. It also covers the evaporitic Elk Point Basin behind the Barrier as well as the regime associated with the carbonate shelves situated in northern Alberta between the Barrier and the northern extent of the fringing reef rimming the Peace River Arch. The geothermal gradient varies from 20 to 80 mK/m (°C/km). A significant regional trend indicating a general northward increase of geothermal gradient is observed in the map area. The northward increase in heat flow likely signifies a transition between high-strength crust in the south to lower strength crust in the north.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→