MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2493478985 · doi:10.1139/w2012-002

Distribution of the <i>vanG</i>-like gene cluster in <i>Clostridium difficile</i> clinical isolates

2012· article· en· W2493478985 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fariza Ammam, Jean‐Christophe Marvaud, Thierry Lambert

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClostridium difficileBiologyLocus (genetics)Gene clusterMicrobiologyMetronidazoleOperonGeneVancomycinGeneticsEnterococcus faecalisHorizontal gene transferGenomeAntibioticsBacteriaEscherichia coliStaphylococcus aureus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Treatment of Clostridium difficile infections generally requires cessation of their causative antibiotic and subsequent administration of metronidazole or vancomycin. Intriguingly, the genome of C. difficile 630 contains a cryptic gene cluster homologous to the vanG-type operon of Enterococcus faecalis BM4518. We detected this cluster by PCR in 35 out of 41 clinical isolates, confirming its large prevalence in this species. The cluster was found to be located in a unique locus. Comparison of this locus with that of strains devoid of the vanG-like cluster indicated that acquisition of the gene cluster occurred in a perfect 19-bp inverted repeat, in the absence of a detectable mobile structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207