MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Anarchy, Surveillance, and Repressing the “Hindu” Menace

2014· book-chapter· en· W2493751311 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Seema Sohi

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnthropological Studies and Insights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHinduismReligious studiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chapter 3 details the collaborative efforts of US, Canadian, and British officials to deport the Indian radical and Ghadar Party leader Har Dayal in the spring of 1914 under the anti-anarchist law. Just as the US and British empires had deployed the specter of anarchy to justify imperial expansion abroad, the alleged threat posed by the “Hindu” anarchist justified the expansion of US state power domestically. As this chapter shows, the foundations for two important phenomena that have been situated in the exigencies of the First World War—the rise of the surveillance state and the implementation of increasingly restrictive immigration and antiradical law—were being laid in this prewar period, in part, through the monitoring of Indian anticolonialists and the joint efforts of US and British officials to repress them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicAnthropological Studies and InsightsFrench-language works237,207