MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2493845996 · doi:10.1057/9780230508224_8

On Track to Post-Leyland Recovery

2001· book-chapter· en· W2493845996 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin Beck-Burridge, Jeremy Walton

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2001
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJaguarTrack (disk drive)BusinessEngineeringComputer scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1979, the official racing Jaguars were silenced, as British Leyland went through corporate agonies that threatened even Jaguar’s existence, in the early eighties. Given what had happened to Britain’s once globally dominant motorcycle industry, Jaguar employees faced the previously inconceivable notion that they could sink with the British Leyland ship, or simply be killed off by their ignorant owners. On the XJ-S front, sales were at an all-time low. In May 1980 John Egan became chairman of Jaguar under Leyland rule and he recalled: ‘Do you know we were just a one product company then? For my first nine months we made no XJ-S coupes at all!’ The Canadian importers ended that drought with an order for 100, Egan remembered, ‘then we made another 100 and that seemed to saturate the market for a while.’ These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1260.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicCorporate Governance and LawFrench-language works237,207