MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2494075534 · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.114284

Red-sided garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) relocation and education project : final report /

2002· book· en· W2494075534 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Danielle Lisa Takats

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAlberta Ecotrust FoundationAlberta Conservation Association
KeywordsThamnophis sirtalisRelocationZoologyBiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A red-sided garter snake ( Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) relocation project was initiated to determine whether snakes would overwinter successfully in another occupied hibemaculum in the Stony Plain area, west of Edmonton, Alberta.A total of 1 190 garter snakes were relocated to a den 9.5 km away that contained over 8500 snakes.Thirty percent of the relocated snakes returned to the new den in the following years.None of the relocated snakes returned to their old den site.Size class measurements show the new den to contain a normal distribution of sizes, while the size distribution of relocated snakes was slightly skewed to larger size classes.Growth rates of the resident snakes and the relocated snakes were similar.Overall the project has been very successful, and shows that snakes can be relocated successfully to another occupied den.Education projects included talks, posters, field trips, media releases, and another snake den management program in Fort Assiniboine.A Snakes of Alberta poster was produced and will also increase public knowledge about snakes and their environments.Vll viii

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→