Bibliographic record
Abstract
X. Change of Scene and Change of Government, 1929-30 30. To W.C. Clark, 17 July 1929 31. To Mackenzie King, 8 February 1930 32. Diary, 13 August - 2 September 1930 XI. Canada and the Pacific, 1931-33 33. Canadian Representation in the East, 8 July 1931 34. Diary, 23 September, 13 October, and 23 October 1931 35. To Herbert Marler, 23 January 1932 36. Diary, 29 January - 2 March 1932 37. To Agnes Macphail, 4 March 1932 38. Diary, 4-9 March 1932 39. Manchurian Question, 29 November 1932 40. To Walter Riddell, 24 December 1932 41. To Walter Riddell, 7 January 1933 XII. In London and Geneva, 1933 42. To Isabel, 13 February - 31 March 1933 43. To R.B. Bennett, 31 March 1933 44. To Isabel, 4-7 April 1933 45. To R.B. Bennett, 7 April 1933 46. To W.L. Grant, 3 February 1934
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.272 | 0.092 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".