MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2494532104 · doi:10.1109/icc.2016.7511137

A novel neuro-optimization method for multi-operator scheduling in cloud-RANs

2016· article· en· W2494532104 on OpenAlexaff
Hazem M. Soliman, Alberto Leon‐Garcia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingDistributed computingScheduling (production processes)HeuristicJob shop schedulingComputationComputer networkMathematical optimizationRouting (electronic design automation)Artificial intelligenceOperating systemAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The software-defined approach of cloud radio access networks (C-RANs) enables supporting multiple virtual operators (VOs) on the same physical infrastructure. In this shared environment, a coordinator is needed to manage the sharing of resources between the VOs. Designing a coordinator is about striking a good balance between the flexibility given to the VOs, and the efficiency of the resource utilization. In this paper, we study the problem of coordinated scheduling in the multi-operator cloud-RAN environment. We formulate the problem as a distributed scheduling performed by the VOs, after which they submit their resource requests to a centralized coordinator. The coordinator selects a subset of non-conflicting requests for transmission. We show that the problem in the general case is NP-hard. We then discuss two special cases and relate them to the existing communication protocols. By gaining insights from these two special cases, we propose a general heuristic, which works on any formulation of the problem, and is still able to provide close-to-optimum performance in the special cases we considered. The heuristic is shown to have some similarities to the neuro-computation techniques such as Hopfield-network. Finally, simulation results are provided to show the efficiency of the proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207