What are they reading? A survey of the reading habits and library usage patterns of teens in Nova Scotia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article presente les resultats d'un sondage effectue en 2002-2003 sur les habitudes de lecture et les modeles d'utilisation des bibliotheques des adolescents de Nouvelle-Ecosse. Dans l'ensemble, cette etude a determine que 84 % des adolescents de Nouvelle-Ecosse lisent au moins un livre par annee pour leur plaisir. Cependant, le fosse de lecture qui existe entre les sexes parait s'agrandir et autant les habitudes de lecture que de l'utilisation de la bibliotheque semblent diminuer avec l'âge. Alors que les bibliotheques de Nouvelle-Ecosse constituent toujours une ressource importante pour la recherche et l'aide aux devoirs, les chaines de librairies gagnent rapidement en popularite et deviennent la source preferee pour le materiel de lecture de loisir. Les adolescents ne considerent pas que les bibliothecaires puissent influencer leurs choix pour la lecture de loisir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".