What are they reading? A survey of the reading habits and library usage patterns of teens in Nova Scotia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article presente les resultats d'un sondage effectue en 2002-2003 sur les habitudes de lecture et les modeles d'utilisation des bibliotheques des adolescents de Nouvelle-Ecosse. Dans l'ensemble, cette etude a determine que 84 % des adolescents de Nouvelle-Ecosse lisent au moins un livre par annee pour leur plaisir. Cependant, le fosse de lecture qui existe entre les sexes parait s'agrandir et autant les habitudes de lecture que de l'utilisation de la bibliotheque semblent diminuer avec l'âge. Alors que les bibliotheques de Nouvelle-Ecosse constituent toujours une ressource importante pour la recherche et l'aide aux devoirs, les chaines de librairies gagnent rapidement en popularite et deviennent la source preferee pour le materiel de lecture de loisir. Les adolescents ne considerent pas que les bibliothecaires puissent influencer leurs choix pour la lecture de loisir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it