MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2494636626 · doi:10.5149/9780807888902_jones.6

Not a Woman's Rights Convention

2007· book-chapter· en· W2494636626 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martha S. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of North Carolina Press eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsPublicityConventionGender studiesEmigrationLawPolitical scienceSubject (documents)Sociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter begins by showing how the woman question lingered over Mary Ann Shadd while she toured the United States promoting the emigration of African Americans to Canada. Shadd's subject matter was provocative, yet she found herself ridiculed for her womanhood as much as for her political point of view. Shadd would eventually win the favor of the local three-judge panel in an appearance in Philadelphia's Banneker Institute, in which she engaged one of its most prominent members, Isaiah Wears, in a debate. Women's rights, and the female publicity implicit in the Cleveland consensus of 1848, had been, for a short time, a point of convergence for African American political leaders. By the mid-1850s, the same ideas were feared and derided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of North Carolina Press eBooksSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207