Top-k queries for multi-category RFID systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the practically important problem of top-k queries, which is to find the top k largest categories and their corresponding sizes. In this paper, we propose a Top-k Query (TKQ) protocol and a technique that we call Segmented Perfect Hashing (SPH) for optimizing TKQ. Specifically, TKQ is based on the framed slotted Aloha protocol. Each tag responds to the reader with a Single-One Geometric (SOG) string using the ON-OFF Keying modulation. TKQ leverages the length of continuous leading 1s in the combined signal to estimate the corresponding category size. TKQ can quickly eliminate the sufficiently small categories, and only needs to focus on a limited number of large-size categories that require more accurate estimation. We conduct rigorous analysis to guarantee the predefined accuracy constraints. To further improve time-efficiency, we propose the SPH scheme, which improves the average frame utilization of TKQ from 36.8% to nearly 100% by establishing a bijective mapping between tag categories and slots. To minimize the overall time cost, we optimize the key parameter that trades off between communication cost and computation cost. Experimental results show that our TKQ+SPH protocol not only achieves the required accuracy constraints, but also achieves a 2.6~7x faster speed than the existing protocols.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".