MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2495110942 · doi:10.1182/blood.v110.11.454.454

Effect of Anemia and Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

2007· article· en· W2495110942 on OpenAlexaff
Anargyros Xenocostas, Houxiang Hu, Xiangru Lu, Ian Chin‐Yee, Qingping Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Canadian institutionsCanadian Blood ServicesLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionHemoglobinAnemiaBlood transfusionCardiologyInternal medicineLigationArteryRed blood cellSurgeryAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The optimal hemoglobin (Hb) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (MI) is unknown. Anemia reduces the oxygen carrying capacity of blood and may theoretically exacerbate ischemia increasing myocardial injury. The benefit of transfusion to correct anemia in acute coronary syndromes is also controversial. The goal of this study was to determine the optimal Hb in the setting of acute MI and whether transfusion reduces myocardial injury and improves outcome. Experimental design: Ninety-two male Sprague-Dawley rats (170–190g) were divided into 8 groups: 1: Normal Hb, sham operation; 2: Normal Hb, MI; 3: Hb 80–90g/L, sham; 4: Hb 80–90g/L, MI; 5: Hb 70–80g/L, sham; 6: Hb 70–80g/L, MI; 7: Hb 80–90g/L, MI with transfusion to 100g/L; 8: Hb 80–90g/L, MI with transfusion to 120g/L. To determine the effect of blood transfusion, fresh blood was immediately transfused following MI. Induction of myocardial infarction was preformed by left coronary artery ligation. Sham-operated rats underwent the same surgical procedure without ligation. At 24 hours post-MI, rats were re-anaesthetized and hemodynamic measurements preformed. Area at risk and infarct size was measured by Evans blue and triphenyltetrazolium chloride, respectively. Results: In the normal Hb group (140–150g/L), survival following sham or MI surgery was 100%. Reduction of Hb to 80–90 and 70–80g/L significantly decreased survival post-MI to 42% and 47%, respectively. Survival was significantly improved after transfusion of fresh blood to raise the hemoglobin from 80–90g/L to 100g/L (P<0.05). However, there was no improvement in survival when Hb was raised by transfusion to 120g/L (P=NS). Twenty-four hours post-MI, the ischemic to non-ischemic left ventricle (LV) weight ratios were not significantly different between any groups indicating similar areas of myocardial ischemia among all groups (P=NS). However, the infarct size to area at risk ratios were significantly increased in both 70–80g/L and 80–90g/L groups compared to the normal Hb group (P<0.05). Transfusion from Hb 80–90g/L to 100g/L significantly decreased infarct size compared to the Hb 80–90g/L group (P<0.05). However, transfusion to Hb 120g/L resulted in a significantly larger infarct size compared to the Hb 100g/L transfused group (P<0.05). Cardiac function was determined at 24 hours post-MI. Heart rate, MAP, LVSP and LVEDP were not significantly different among all groups but anemic groups 80–90 and 70–80g/L showed a significant decrease in LV +dP/dtmax and −dP/dtmin in both sham and MI rats (P<0.01) with the most significant decrease noted in MI rats compared to sham operated rats (P<0.05). Blood transfusion post-MI from a Hb 80–90 to 100g/L significantly improved LV +dP/dtmax (P<0.05). Transfusion to Hb 120g/L did not result in any further improvement in cardiac function. Conclusions: In the setting of acute MI, anemia increased mortality and infarct size compared to non-anemic controls. At 24 hours post-MI, anemia also impaired cardiac function. Transfusion of anemic animals up to a Hb of 100g/L with fresh RBCs reduced mortality and infarct size and improved cardiac function. However, transfusion to a Hb of 120g/L did not demonstrate any additional benefit and was associated with larger infarcts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicErythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentFrench-language works237,207