Bibliographic record
Abstract
Like most modernist poets, H.D. found her first chance to publish her avant-garde work in ‘little magazines’: ‘Priapus’ (later renamed ‘Orchard’), ‘Hermes of the Ways’ and ‘Epigram, After the Greek’ appeared in 1913 in the third issue of Harriet Monroe's new Poetry magazine. Until after the Second World War, some of H.D.'s most important poetry and crucial critical essays continued to appear first in such magazines. During the teens and twenties, her poems could be found in all of the most daring and innovative journals of the time – including (in addition to Poetry), The New Freewoman, The Egoist, Glebe, The Little Review, Contact, Sphere, The Dial, Coterie, Gargoyle, Rhythmus, Double Dealer, Transatlantic Review, This Quarter, The Chapbook, Close Up, transition, Agenda, Pagany, Seed and Life and Letters Today . This was the era of the great women editors and publishers, including Harriet Monroe of Poetry , Dora Marsden and Harriet Shaw Weaver of The New Freewoman and The Egoist , Margaret Anderson and Jane Heap of The Little Review and Sylvia Beach and Adrienne Monnier of Shakespeare & Company. H.D. knew them all, but like Marianne Moore, who for a few years edited The Dial , she was deeply committed to her own writing career and never wished to make editing and publishing the work of others her dominant literary contribution. Despite this, she was thrust into the role of literary editor on The Egoist during the teens, when she also undertook a stabilising editorial role in the compilation of Some Imagist Poets 1915, 1916 and 1917 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".