Low Annual Fidelity and Early Upstream Migration of Anadromous Arctic Char in a Variable Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The life histories of anadromous Arctic Char Salvelinus alpinus are complex and vary greatly between populations and environments. Here, we detail key aspects of the physical environment and life history of a population of Arctic Char from Nulahugyuk Creek, Nunavut, Canada, to characterize migration traits in a highly variable environment. Over the course of this migration, creek discharge declined precipitously, forcing Arctic Char to migrate through shallow water with large diel temperature fluctuations (>10°C) and high temperature extremes (>21°C). The downstream migration of adults (>55 cm) began in mid‐June and continued into early July, while the downstream migration of smolts (<30 cm) began in late June and continued until late July. The upstream adult migration began in late June and ended in late July, far earlier than most upstream migrations in the region. There was no appreciable upstream migration of juveniles, and Arctic Char 30 to 55 cm in length were absent from the up‐ and downstream migrations. The average age at first migration was 4 years, and the youngest adult Arctic Char migrating upstream were 8 and 9 years old. The missing size‐ and age‐classes, and the fact that most upstream migrants were near reproductive maturity, indicate that Arctic Char in this system typically leave at a length of 19 cm and an age of 4 years and do not return for 4 to 5 years, when they are ready to reproduce. Anadromous Nulahugyuk Creek Arctic Char appear to employ strategies that limit their exposure to restrictive migratory conditions and facilitate their existence in an otherwise uninhabitable system. Understanding such population‐specific migratory strategies is critical to the management of Arctic Char fisheries, which are comprised of populations with highly diverse life histories, and to our understanding of how these life histories may contribute to the adaptability and persistence of the species as climate change progresses. Received November 24, 2015; accepted March 23, 2016 Published online July 28, 2016
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".