MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2495568590 · doi:10.1057/9780230288102_5

Russia’s Muslims after the Collapse of Communism

2002· book-chapter· en· W2495568590 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Galina M. Yémelianova

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2002
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoviet and Russian History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommunismPoliticsIslamPolitical scienceIndependence (probability theory)Soviet unionState (computer science)Economic historyAsidePopulationNationalismDevelopment economicsQuarter (Canadian coin)Ancient historyPolitical economyGeographyLawHistorySociologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the predictions of some Western experts, Islam and nationalism were not among the major factors behind the collapse of Communism and the break-up of the USSR. 1 So, when in December 1991 the Soviet Union ceased to exist, the bulk of Soviet Muslims, with the exception of a small faction among the Chechens, Tatars, Uzbeks and Kazakhs, were bewildered and frustrated by the new political realities. As a result of the disintegration of the Soviet state, over seventy million Muslims, constituting about a quarter of the total population of the USSR, found themselves in different political entities represented by newly independent states of Russia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, as well as other former Soviet republics which had Muslim minorities. Russia’s Muslims, who made up between twelve and twenty million, were overnight cut off from their more numerous co-religionists in Central Asia and Transcaucasus and transformed into Russia’s religious minority. Since this book focuses on the Muslims of Russia, analysis of the situation in the former Soviet Muslim republics which acquired political independence from Moscow is left aside. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks→Same topicSoviet and Russian History→French-language works237,207→